BMS 8N515 PDF

drawing & mounting du cone driver BMS BMS 8N (8Ohm) spl vs frequency measurement du cone driver BMS BMS 8N (8Ohm) spl vs impedance. 96 dB Sensitivity 1 W / 1 m W Power Handling Extremely light Weight of kg 2″ Aluminium Sandwich Voice Coil for low Power Compression Double. Ciare FXI MR 8Ω. ” Mid-range. Fs, Hz. Power RMS, W, Qts, Sensitivity, 97 dB, Vas, litres. Freq-range, 90 – Hz, Xmax, mm.

Author: Kigazragore Balmaran
Country: Kazakhstan
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Spiritual
Published (Last): 12 February 2018
Pages: 384
PDF File Size: 13.91 Mb
ePub File Size: 13.7 Mb
ISBN: 424-9-53198-595-1
Downloads: 20671
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Shakakora

Thank you for your input tho.

To that end I suggested he used a particular Bass driver which I then could see he had already considered. Hey yall, dunno if im placing this in the wrong section as im fairly “unadvanced”: Edited by CMS – 25 November at Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

I would then cross the around hz.

Its a part of a larger 4-way application in which so far theoreticly the low end is handled by 4×12″ This page was generated in 0.

None the less, il give it a go. And how about getting all 3 and testing them, then keep the one you like most? Most linear FR, Lower Fs, Higher Xmax, More power handling Do neodymium magnets not in general have smaller voicecoil gaps and therefore lower distortion factors, than with a larger more resonant gap? Do neodymium magnets not in general have smaller voicecoil gaps and therefore lower distortion factors, than with a larger more resonant gap?

  FANSADOX COLLECTION 260 - THE CLINIC PDF

BMS 8 Driver : Elements Audio, Web Store

O That is because they are often used solely with a 15″ bass driver. If anyone could possibly help me, id much appreciate it: Maybe i should have added that this does not present the whole system With all this in mind, disregarding prices which obviously makes the 8S desirable is the slightly higher moving mass and the slightly lower sens in the 8N that unwanted, as to make the 8N better despite the immediate visual inferiority?

The question was put mainly to get a grasp on what the topic states too, the reasoning for choosing drivers compared to the data presented without having actually heard it If you go back to the original thread you will see that the OP wanted Hi-Fi sound. I’ve been looking at a pair of 8″ drivers to sit below the BMS Nd For the purpose of this question i’l restrict the drivers layed out to: From what i can see and with my limited capability interpret by the data, my reasoning would tell me that the 8N has all the pro’s and no con’s going for it.

  ANEMIA SIDEROBLASTICA HEREDITARIA PDF

BMS 8N – 8″ Bass Midrange Loudspeaker W 8 Ohms from BMS £

I agree that the is capable of more but look at the loads of folks that use them for home hi-fi, hundreds in the States: You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum 8n551 cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum. I did notice the differences in distortion’s however is that what might wheigh heavy on nms choice?

D just two thoughts: I know what 2 x the above mentions 8″ jobbies mentioned will do and a pair of them will work very well with the bass drivers to allow a hz ish X-over to the bass.

Don’t test the champignon sound. OP use the 8S You need to be using bmd bigger I’d reckon 12 or 15 before its paying its way.